The Surprising Source of Inspiration for Albert Einstein

The Surprising Source of Inspiration for Albert Einstein

Today’s science fiction is often tomorrow’s innovation. Whether you’re talking about hoverboards, self-driving cars, or retinal scanning, you can point to sci-fi stories in which the idea appeared long before someone started working on it in reality.

And as it turns out, the ideas in several stories may have provided inspiration for some of Albert Einstein’s theories. What’s more, Einstein used stories to explain complex concepts to lay audiences. In particular, he relied on the fiction of writers named Felix Eberty and Aaron Bernstein. “He recalled devouring Bernstein’s work, in particular, ‘with breathless attention,’ and it may have inspired one of the conjectures that led to his special theory of relativity,” writes Jimena Canales in The New Yorker.

In his 1846 story “The Stars and World History,” Eberty speculated on what might happen if humans could travel faster than the speed of light. He also wondered what would you would see if you observed events that had unfolded on Earth from a faraway star. You might, he wrote, “see the earth at this moment as it existed at the time of Abraham.” As for Bernstein, he wrote about a great cosmic postal service for which the past and the present were outdated concepts. If you traveled faster than light, you could deliver mail to historical figures.

In 1916, Einstein used “fanciful imaginings like those of Eberty” to explain general relativity and his grand theory to wider audiences, Canales writes. Interestingly, at the time, there was a precedent for using popular stories to explain space-time contortions. French physicist Paul Langevin had previously evoked Jules Verne’s storytelling universe–specifically, a space-travel device Verne calls a “projectile”–during a lecture on special relativity. “Einstein chose more familiar conveyances,” writes Canales. “His stories featured ‘our old friend the railway carriage.'”

Audiences worldwide were enchanted with the stories made possible by Einstein’s theories. The media flocked to astronomers who could spin amusing yarns based on relativity’s concepts. In 1919, Canales notes, astronomer Arthur Eddington gave a talk at Trinity College, Cambridge. The New York Times headline for the story was: “Professor Eddington, 6 Feet to the Eye, Explains How It May Be Really Only 3 Feet.”

That was just the beginning of Eddington’s charm. In a 1920 essay he informed readers what it would be like to travel at almost nine-tenths the speed of light. “The pilot’s watch would seem, to a terrestrial observer, to tick twice as slowly; his cigar would seem to burn twice as long,” explains Canales.

The popularity of relativity–and the fanciful storytelling surrounding it–meant that Einstein had to deal with detractors. French philosopher Henri Bergson implied that Einstein’s talent “was not so different from that of H. G. Wells, whose novel The Time Machine had considered time as a fourth dimension, just as general relativity did,” writes Canales. “Perhaps both fascinated the public because of their fictional qualities more than their scientific ones.” Bergson’s arguments carried weight. As late as 1922, the Nobel Committee for Physics still did not accept Einstein’s relativity theory as valid.

Einstein battled back. In 1923, when Eberty’s “The Stars and World History” was being republished, Einstein agreed to write an intro. He called Eberty “an original and ingenious person.” Eberty, like Einstein, had grasped that “a seemingly stable feature of reality was neither unidirectional nor absolute.”

For entrepreneurs, Einstein’s plight is a helpful reminder of the way skillful storytelling can turn complex concepts into relatable ones. Not long ago I spoke to serial entrepreneur David Norris. He could’ve described his latest venture, MD Insider, as a startup that arms patients with data to compare physicians. That’s what it is. Instead, though, he began with a story about his own experience with a botched surgery. He made the concept of his company relatable to anyone who’s ever regretted a doctor’s visit. He took it out of the province of data, which can be dry and boring.

The other takeaway of Einstein’s story is that no matter how profound or brilliant your concept is, you will still have to do the work of explaining it in a way that people can understand. And as soon as your concept gains popularity, you can expect a new wave of detractors who–like Bergson–will denounce your idea for that very reason.

 

7 Comments

  • sdf says:

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get set up?
    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Appreciate it

    • admin says:

      Thanks!
      You can have a similar blog.

      • Javahn says:

        I have a several qulebibs with Mr. Garik’s grammar, and I’m unsure about the problems with the theory of relativity that Mr. Garik mentions in the second paragraph both Special and General Relativity have verified well, in fact more experimental disagreements with relativity theory would help point the way to a Theory of Everything that would unify Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. I’d also approach the sixth and last paragraph differently: if an object have mass, it requires an infinite amount of energy to reach light speed. Since infinity is a limit and not an countable number, an object with mass can never reach light speed (as measured either in a stationary reference frame or in the object’s reference frame.) Having expressed these reservations, I must say that Mr. Garik does a decent job discussing what happens to the flow of time in Special Relativity.What Special Relativity actually predicts is that time will flow more slowly for a near-light-speed traveler than for someone who stays behind on Earth. The distance traveled also shrinks by the same factor, with the result that the traveler and the Earth-based observer measure the same speed. This occurs at a deep physical level and has been verified by decay behavior of secondary cosmic rays and by time differences induced in matched high-precision clocks East and West around the Earth (with and against the Earth’s rotation).However, considering times and distances just measured by the traveler or just measured by the Earth-based observer misses a major point which could be critical. From the travelers’ perspective, what matters is how long it takes to reach the destination. For a trip to Alpha Centauri 4.3 light-years from Earth, accelerating at a constant rate of 1 g to the halfway point and then decelerating at the same rate for the rest of the trip, a traveler would measure a trip time of 3.56 years a little less than 3 years and 7 months. If the traveler thinks of the trip distance as 4.3 light-years, which is true at the beginning and end of the trip, then the traveler’s average effective speed is faster than the speed of light.

  • Hobert says:

    This really answered my problem, thank you!

  • bart cilkop says:

    I like what you guys tend to be up too. Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the excellent works guys I’ve included you guys to our blogroll.

    • Vanessa says:

      , it is herethat the most fuftirul field of investigation would be. Number is considered the most primalarchetype of order in the human mind,and when synchronistic events occur thereusually appears a number connection .Jung describes several of them in his essayon Synchroncity.I’ve posted some of mine on the net, andin google search they are listed as, entelekk.

  • Angel says:

    All of these movies were made once and then re-made by the same dicetror, presumably due to a surfeit of time (which all of us have) and also of money and patience (which most of us do not).

Leave a Reply